Which is Faster SRT or Track-hawk?

Performance SUV Guide | Simi Valley Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram

The question is simple: which is faster, the Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT or the Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk? The answer is also simple. The Trackhawk is faster in nearly every measurable performance category, including horsepower, torque, 0 to 60 mph acceleration, quarter-mile time, and top speed.

But that does not mean the Grand Cherokee SRT is weak. Far from it. The SRT is still one of the most exciting naturally aspirated SUVs Jeep ever built, with a 6.4-liter HEMI V8, aggressive throttle response, a performance-tuned all-wheel-drive system, and the kind of sound that makes every on-ramp feel like a private drag strip.

SRT vs Trackhawk: The Basic Difference

The Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT and Trackhawk both came from the WK2-generation Grand Cherokee lineup, but they were built with different performance missions. The SRT was the high-performance V8 version for drivers who wanted a fast, powerful, naturally aspirated SUV. The Trackhawk was the extreme version, using the same general Hellcat engine family that made Dodge muscle cars famous.

The SRT feels muscular, loud, and immediate. The Trackhawk feels violent. That is the easiest way to understand the difference. The SRT is fast for an SUV. The Trackhawk is fast, period.

Which Has More Horsepower?

The Trackhawk wins by a massive margin. The Grand Cherokee SRT makes 475 horsepower from its 6.4-liter HEMI V8. That is already serious output for a family-sized SUV. The Trackhawk, however, jumps to 707 horsepower from a supercharged 6.2-liter V8.

That 232-horsepower difference completely changes the character of the vehicle. In the SRT, power builds with the naturally aspirated V8’s revs. In the Trackhawk, power arrives with a hard supercharged shove that feels almost excessive for an SUV body.

MotorTrend lists the Grand Cherokee SRT at 475 horsepower and 470 lb-ft of torque, while the Trackhawk uses a supercharged 6.2-liter V8 with 707 horsepower and 645 lb-ft of torque. MotorTrend also recorded a 3.3-second 0 to 60 mph time for the Trackhawk in testing. Source: MotorTrend

Which Is Faster From 0 to 60 MPH?

The Trackhawk is dramatically faster from 0 to 60 mph. The difference is not just horsepower. It is traction, torque, launch control, gearing, and the way the supercharged engine floods the drivetrain with power.

The Grand Cherokee SRT is quick enough to feel aggressive in daily driving. It can surprise people because it does not look like a lightweight performance car. Still, once the Trackhawk launches, the SRT cannot keep up.

Car and Driver reported a 3.5-second 0 to 60 mph test result for the Grand Cherokee Trackhawk, while Automobile Catalog lists factory-claimed Trackhawk performance at 0 to 60 mph in 3.5 seconds, a quarter mile in 11.6 seconds, and a top speed of 180 mph. Source: Car and Driver | Source: Automobile Catalog

Why the Trackhawk Is So Much Faster

The Trackhawk is faster because it was engineered around extreme power. Its 6.2-liter supercharged V8 delivers huge torque, and because the Grand Cherokee platform uses all-wheel drive, that power can be put down more effectively than it could in many rear-wheel-drive vehicles.

In simple terms, the SRT has a big engine. The Trackhawk has a bigger performance system. The engine, transmission calibration, all-wheel-drive tuning, cooling, brakes, suspension setup, launch control, and tires are all working together to manage Hellcat-level output.

Key reasons the Trackhawk wins

Does the SRT Still Feel Fast?

Yes. The Grand Cherokee SRT still feels genuinely fast. A 475-horsepower SUV is not slow by any normal standard. The naturally aspirated 6.4-liter HEMI gives it instant throttle response, a deep exhaust note, and a more mechanical muscle-car feel than the Trackhawk.

Some drivers may actually prefer the SRT because it feels simpler and more traditional. There is no supercharger whine, no 707-horsepower shock factor, and no sense that the vehicle is constantly trying to overpower the road. The SRT is still dramatic, but it is more usable and less outrageous.

Which One Sounds Better?

This is more subjective. The SRT’s 6.4-liter HEMI has a deep, old-school V8 sound. It is raw, heavy, and muscular. Because it is naturally aspirated, the engine note feels direct and traditional.

The Trackhawk adds a different layer. You still get V8 sound, but you also get supercharger whine. For some drivers, that makes the Trackhawk more exciting. For others, the SRT’s simpler HEMI soundtrack is cleaner and more satisfying.

If you want classic American V8 drama, the SRT is excellent. If you want a supercharged soundtrack that makes the SUV feel like a Hellcat in hiking boots, the Trackhawk wins.

Which One Is Better for Daily Driving?

The SRT may be the better daily driver for many people. It is still powerful, still aggressive, and still fun, but it does not carry the same fuel thirst, tire wear, brake demands, and overall intensity as the Trackhawk.

The Trackhawk is usable every day, but it is also extreme. Fuel economy is poor, maintenance can be more expensive, and insurance costs may be higher. It is a vehicle that rewards restraint, because the power is always there.

Which One Is Better for Towing and Utility?

Both vehicles are still Grand Cherokees, which means they retain SUV practicality. They have real passenger space, cargo room, all-weather capability, and towing usefulness. However, most shoppers looking at an SRT or Trackhawk are not buying them only for towing. They are buying performance first.

The SRT may make more sense if you want a strong V8 SUV that can handle family duty, weekend trips, and occasional towing without the full cost and intensity of the Trackhawk. The Trackhawk is more about maximum performance with SUV practicality attached.

Which One Holds Value Better?

The Trackhawk has stronger collector appeal because it represents one of the most extreme factory SUVs ever sold by Jeep. The Hellcat-powered Jeep era created a vehicle that feels unlikely to be repeated in the same way, especially as brands continue moving toward electrification, hybrids, and smaller-displacement engines.

The SRT also has value because naturally aspirated V8 SUVs are becoming less common. However, the Trackhawk’s 707-horsepower identity gives it a more obvious enthusiast hook.

Condition, mileage, accident history, service records, ownership history, tires, brakes, and modifications matter heavily for both vehicles. A clean, stock, well-maintained SRT may be a smarter buy than a neglected Trackhawk.

Should You Buy the SRT or the Trackhawk?

Buy the Grand Cherokee SRT if you want a loud, fast, naturally aspirated V8 SUV that feels muscular without being completely outrageous. It gives you serious performance, all-wheel-drive grip, and daily usability in a package that is easier to live with than the Trackhawk.

Buy the Grand Cherokee Trackhawk if you want the fastest version, the most horsepower, the strongest acceleration, and the biggest bragging rights. It is not subtle. It is not efficient. It is not rational in the traditional family SUV sense. That is exactly why people love it.

Final Verdict: Which Is Faster?

The Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk is faster than the Grand Cherokee SRT. It has more horsepower, more torque, quicker acceleration, a faster quarter-mile time, and a higher top-speed ceiling. The SRT is still a serious performance SUV, but the Trackhawk belongs in another category.

The SRT is the one for drivers who want traditional HEMI power and a more balanced performance SUV. The Trackhawk is the one for drivers who want the answer to be obvious before the race even starts.

SRT vs Trackhawk FAQs

Sources: Performance figures were cross-checked using MotorTrend, Car and Driver, and Automobile Catalog data for the Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT and Trackhawk. Always verify exact specifications by model year, trim, condition, and vehicle history before purchase.